Family Violence Essay

While it is difficult to create a concrete definition of family vehemence or blame eachone involved in it, no one ordain disagree with the incident that it can be disastrous for all members of any family. The inherent complexity of such situations makes it difficult to blame any integrity person of the family or to underpin a particular gender as the sole guilty screw such occurrence. Therefore this study in brief explores why this issue looks so complicated and whether such complication would foster to solve the situation.According to Levesque et al. (2001), family strength involves family members acts of omission or commission that resolvent in physical do by, sexual abuse, neglect, or other forms of maltreatment, which eventually hampers rubicund ontogenesis of humans. The above definition fairly indicates that on that point argon more faces of family force play and it can be difficult for an outsider to identify if there is any violence ongoing in a family.However, American academy of Family Physicians (2009), explains family violence as the intentional intimidation or abuse of children, adults or elders by a family member, intimate companion or c betaker to gain strength and control over the victim.While the first definition to the senior highest degreely emphasizes on action, the second one stresses on intention. This adds to the complexity by highlighting the fact that family violence can take place even without the knowledge of most of the members in a family (Lau et al., 1999).For example, a father may find fresh as an effective tool to intimidate his daughter, and may intentionally does that take away and on, which may not be considered as violence by her re upset or other members of that family and thus such practice might slide by to ruin the victims future. This is very much possible, since many acts be considered as socially accepted violence, such as spanking, and which be not considered as abusive violence, which accord ing to the researchers an act which has a high potential for injuring the person being hit (Straus et al, 1980, pp. 21-22).The above state of personal business shows that there is much ambiguity in pinpointing family violence which in turn points at the fact that how difficult it could be to redress it or to bear off its occurrence.This signifies the importance of spreading awareness about the damaging potential of family violence and promoting the adoption of behavioral processes that can effectively eliminate such occurrences in a family. For example, encouraging parents to abstain from using corporal punishment to their children could be a way to lessen the instances of child abuse because the intention behind corporal punishment, i.e., to cause pain but not injury for purposes of coercion and control (Strauss et al., 1980) may be lost with raised temper and bolshy of control.In all, any injury has the potential to leave a set on human mind and thus can considerably run th e actions of the victims, which may create further problems to the society. It is from this angle, the hidden niches of family violence need to be identified and redressed, and from that perspective, humans dumbfound to go through complex discussions and debates in way of finding its solution.It is not that family violence is a new phenomenon of the society, since instances of it are spread all over in the literature of all times, and earning some(prenominal) sobriquets in different periods, like battered child syndrome (Kempe et al., 1962), granny bashing (Burston, 1975) or battered woman (Walker, 1979).Therefore, it is the pressing lifestyle of modern times have given it some more dimensions and accordingly, the educated minds of modern times are trying to deeply investigate its root as well as its intrinsic effects on human mind. Consequently, the perception about family violence is also gradually changing, where the earlier idea of focusing on the violence on women, children as the potential victims is making way to a newer concept that includes all humans and considers any act detrimental to human development as family violence (Pleck, 1987).ConclusionThe apparent complexity in defining or determining family is actually an outcome of the honest search of the researchers that has brought onward many hidden niches of family violence. This is the right process, because the more the mechanism of family becomes clear forward all, the more humans will be able to eradicate it and coin towards a prosperous and happy future.ReferencesAmerican Academy of Family Physicians. (2009). Family and intimate partner violence and abuse. Retrieved July 19, 2009, from http//www.aafp.org/online/en/home/policy/policies/f/familyandintimatepartner- violenceandabuse.htmlBurston, G. R. (1975). Granny battering. British Medical Journal, 3, 592.Kemple, C. H., Silverman, F. N., Steele, B. F., Droegemullar, W., and Silver, Hl. K. (1962). The battered-child syndrome. Journal of the American Medical Association, 181, 105-112.Lau, J. T. F., Liu, J. L. Y., Tong, C. K., and Tan, P. M. E. H. (1999). Conceptualizations, reporting and under-reporting of child abuse in Hong Kong. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23, 1159-1174Lavesque, D. A., Velicer, W.F., Castle, P. H., and Greene, R. N. (2008). Violence against women. Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 158-164.Pleck, E. (1987). Domestic one-man rule The making of social policy against family violence from colonical times to the present. New York Oxford University Press.Straus, M. A., Gelles, R.J., and Steinmetz, S.K. (1980). coffin nail closed doors Violence in American families. Doubleday, NewYork.Walker, L. E. (1979). The battered woman. New York Harer Colophon Books.