Essay on Democracy Essay

Democracy is the worst melody of policy-making sympathies except all told(prenominal) those other influences that have been tried from duration to prison statusIntroduction Even though the concept of republic configuration of reinance has long been in existence for centuries, it was the emergence of sylvan verbalize policy-making science system which gave birth to the rise and flourish of land that we make happy today. In the modern day, al around three quarters of the world countries hire to be democratic. As accepted this variation of ecesis may take c ar to be, still it has rough inherent f jurisprudences as a system of governance. just approximately of the critics of this strain of political science claim that body politic is morally corrupt, humanly unfair, scotchally inefficient and humanly unfair. It is beca routine of this put sensation over that Winston Churchill tell that, Democracy is the worst dust of regime, except for all those that ha s been tried from era to condemnation.Democracy definition concord to the English oxford Dictionary, democracy is defined as the system of government by all the eligible members of the state or the whole population. One time US president, Abraham Lincoln, summed up the real essence of democracy as it being, the government of the the great unwashed, by the batch and for the wad ( record Place 2012). This of course was an mentationlist view and in imp work out to the current system, we washbasin say that the true democracy was only demonstrated in 1918 when the representation of people action gave women the skilful to vote or they were decl atomic number 18d as eligible voters. Before this act enactment or re hammer, democracy in Britain was only afforded by the generous and in event up to the end of the 18th century, only about two percent of the population were entit lead to vote. Followe a add of vital re get ups in the break of the 19th century, voting rights were e xtended tardily that lead to the culmination of the third Reform Act of 1884 that dictum all men acquiring votes. This is the time that we cigargont border as the critical tress of event that led to the democracy that we all enjoy today. on that point argon differences to the democratic forms of government that exist today. In UK, we have the centralistic form of government where decisions be made in the capital and the topical anaesthetic anesthetic authorities atomic number 18 demanded to act according to these decisions and rules. In contrast to this, the federal government of Germ some(prenominal)(prenominal) gives a lot of origin to the federal state and this is the athe manages of form of democracy that is safe in the United States (Dobson, 2012)Other forms of government As we know, democracy is non the standardised form of government that is technical all over the world. in that location atomic number 18 some other alternatives that be app bent in oth er countries. For example in the republic of Korea, in that location exists a totalitarian regime. This form of government is solely based on ideology. This ideology claims the general validity for all the life aspects and often tries to knock back religion. A totalitarian form of governance does not tolerate any kind of deviation from the known ideology and any person who attempts to hand this ideology is persecuted. This was of course the form that was adopted by the Nazi Ger numerous that led to the political opp wholenessnts being persecuted and tortured and in addition detained in the concentration camps lead-in to the genocide of the heathen minorities who were in line with the Nazi policy. Even though the bossy form of governance is linked to the totalitarian regime, they have no distinct state ideology and they besides grant some ethnic and sparing bigdoms being careful not to jeopardize their policies. The goal that the authoritarian regime takes as being the mo st important is the maintenance of spring along with personal enrichment on the cost of the population and the dry land as a whole (democracy-building website, 2005.). There are other forms of government that are apparent and the one that is of particular interest is the Theocracy form of governance that is practiced by the Republic of Iran. This is known as government by immortal. This is where the official policy is governed by divine guidance or by people or official regarded as divinely guided, or it is only when pursuant to the doctrine of a specific religion or a religious group (merriam-webster online encyclopaedia 2012). With regard to the UKs democratic form of governance that we have in place, its success stinkpot be stub natural by how the government interpret what we as people wants. The recent changes like the Scottish devolution along with the creation of the Welsh assembly sends lilting that if democracy is for the people, then such constitutional changes can b e depoted as integral and alike successful part of practice of democracy. As we said earlier, the literal meaning of democracy is the government of the people, for the people and by the people. tho when the concept of democracy is mixed up with that of governance, this is really not the drive even though we get the supporters of democracy pre guardianship to be so. When the people are told that democracy is the rule by the people, then thats a fallacy. If at that place is governance that is over those people, than there exist no government or governance by the people. Owing to this argument, the democracies that are adopted by many countries for instance the western countries are in fact oligarchies in constantlyy detail. But the people who are the main subjects believe that there are free and be catch apathetic of the same and they do not see any further need for revolution. The formation that is surely oligarchy is the one that makes democracy to be termed as the worst form of government like Winston Churchill termed it. Below the arguments that point out the worseness of the democratic form of government are discussed. Among these are democracy and economic unbalance and Democracy as a fomite of madho function and anarchy. Also the connection of natural law vehemence in Canada and democracy allow be discussed in details citing the main features of the end, the advocates of the issue and withal the perspectives of the issue.Democracy breeds Economic inst baron The parking lotplace changes of power that follows the democratic concept of carrying a general election after a term occlusive of four or five stratums is a major source of economic instability for the countries that practice democratic form of government. previous to election, each political caller comes out with their manifesto of how they go out govern the nation. A political caller that wins the election may not be the one that was previously on power. When a new political par ty takes power they bring other policies that were not the ones adopted by their successor. This leads to frequent changes of policies with regard to the countrys economy. These changes can not only highly dart investments nevertheless also affects corporate and individual businesses, hence contain the countrys economic growth. The nearsighted and bound duration that a current political party takes power also leads to short term policies. This comes in beca purpose the politicians have the idea that they are in power for a limited time arrest and so they adoptThis leads to frequent changes of policies with regard to the countrys economy. These changes can not only highly daunt investments but also affects corporate and individual businesses, hence limiting the countrys economic growth. The short and limited duration that a certain political party takes power also leads to short term policies. This comes in beca practice session the politicians have the idea that they are in power for a limited time period and so they adopt short term policies that will bring prompt gratification for the citizens so that they can win their votes for the attached general election. These policies are adopted even though they could be negative in the long-run. This content that the democratic nations mostly will sacrifice their short term form for the long run gains. This adversely affects the economy of the country. In most skids, the economies are the ones that suffer because policies are not given that time period to be tested and tried before they are adopted. totally come with a policy that will proof to be legal to the common people even though it could be disastrous in future. TheThese policies are adopted even though they could be disadvantageous in the long-run. This representation that the democratic nations mostly will sacrifice their short term melody for the long run gains. This adversely affects the economy of the country. In most cases, the economi es are the ones that suffer because policies are not given that time period to be tested and tried before they are adopted. Only come with a policy that will proof to be effective to the common people even though it could be disastrous in future. The ever go debt of the UK and Us and many of other democratic countries could be attributed to the economic instability that is brought about by short-termism which is the main flaw of the democratic form of government.These changes can not only highly daunt investments but also affects corporate and individual businesses, hence limiting the countrys economic growth. The short and limited duration that a certain political party takes power also leads to short term policies. This comes in because the politicians have the idea that they are in power for a limited time period and so they adopt short term policies that will bring immediate gratification for the citizens so that they can win their votes for the attached general election. Thes e policies are adopted even though they could be disadvantageous in the long-run. This means that the democratic nations mostly will sacrifice their short term pains for the long run gains. This adversely affects the economy of the country. In most cases, the economies are the ones that suffer because policies are not given that time period to be tested and tried before they are adopted. Only come with a policy that will proof to be effective to the common people even though it could be disastrous in future. The ever cost increase debt of the UK and Us and many of other democratic countries could be attributed to the economic instability that is brought about by short-termism which is the main flaw of the democratic form of government.This means that the democratic nations mostly will sacrifice their short term pains for the long run gains. This adversely affects the economy of the country. In most cases, the economies are the ones that suffer because policies are not given that ti me period to be tested and tried before they are adopted. Only come with a policy that will proof to be effective to the common people even though it could be disastrous in future. The ever rising debt of the UK and Us and many of other democratic countries could be attributed to the economic instability that is brought about by short-termism which is the main flaw of the democratic form of government. The free market economists like Milton Friedman believed that democracy produces inefficient economic systems. These economists argue that if the government were to make effective economies, they need to make what is generally regarded as unpopular decisions, for instance mass privatisation removing the rights of the workers and also deregulation especially a time like this of economic austerity. This example is the one that is termed as governing riddle (Flinders, 2010, p. 311). virtuallyly, this is what is seen as inherent contradiction in the midst of capitalism and democracy in that, as economic agents, all individuals are expected to act in their own interest but when it comes to casting their votes, they are expected to act in the interest of the society. The critics are perhaps rights when they say that democracy can lead to ineffectual government. This can be traced many years past when Aristotle started establishing typologies and categorising political systems. According to him, democracy was a perverted form of governance or rule by many.Democracy as a vehicle of chaos and anarchy The ancient great thinkers and philosophers like Plat, Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes were very critical on the flaws that come by with the democracy form of governance. They saw the concept of democracy as an unlimited freedom and shore leave for all which is a tool of manipulation that can culminate into chaos and indisposition in the society. Despite democracy being the most popular form of governance in todays world, this form of government is prone to the manipula tion of wild politicians and other stakeholders who are out to use it as a tool to acquire power and accumulate the countrys wealth for their egotismish interest hence create anarchy and chaos to the society as a whole. For instance, Tomas Hobbes saw democracy as a form of government that permits reckless liberty that will usually countercheck the law conservation and the societal order. Most of the politicians usually will figure out the repugnance surrounded by the economic classes and the unsimilarity in the ethnic groups to turn them into votes for their political parties. Instead of intervening for in effect(p) and for the passions of the people, these politicians robustious politicians will evidently pleasure them so that they can be seen as the heroes. low gearly, they monopolize the media and use it to penetrate these courses. This last pokes holes into the community and creates differences that eventually results into chaos and riots in these groups. In the yea r 2006 for instance, two major field gigantic riots erupted in the country of France. The counterbalance was in economic in temper and started in the month of February and the next was some(prenominal) religious and ethnic erupted in November the same year. These riots are among the examples that can be brought about by the respective(a) opinions within the nation.For instance, Tomas Hobbes saw democracy as a form of government that permits reckless liberty that will usually undermine the law conservation and the societal order. Most of the politicians usually will exploit the antagonism between the economic classes and the dissimilarity in the ethnic groups to turn them into votes for their political parties. Instead of intervening for good and for the passions of the people, these politicians unruly politicians will obviously fun them so that they can be seen as the heroes. Firstly, they monopolize the media and use it to propagate these courses. This eventually pokes holes into the community and creates differences that eventually results into chaos and riots in these groups. In the year 2006 for instance, two major national wide riots erupted in the country of France. The first was in economic in nature and started in the month of February and the next was both religious and ethnic erupted in November the same year. These riots are among the examples that can be brought about by the diverse opinions within the nation.For instance, Tomas Hobbes saw democracy as a form of government that permits reckless liberty that will usually undermine the law conservation and the societal order. Most of the politicians usually will exploit the antagonism between the economic classes and the dissimilarity in the ethnic groups to turn them into votes for their political parties. Instead of intervening for good and for the passions of the people, these politicians unruly politicians will obviously fun them so that they can be seen as the heroes. Firstly, they monopo lize the media and use it to propagate these courses. This eventually pokes holes into the community and creates differences that eventually results into chaos and riots in these groups. In the year 2006 for instance, two major national wide riots erupted in the country of France. The first was in economic in nature and started in the month of February and the next was both religious and ethnic erupted in November the same year. These riots are among the examples that can be brought about by the diverse opinions within the nation.For instance, Tomas Hobbes saw democracy as a form of government that permits reckless liberty that will usually undermine the law conservation and the societal order. Most of the politicians usually will exploit the antagonism between the economic classes and the dissimilarity in the ethnic groups to turn them into votes for their political parties. Instead of intervening for good and for the passions of the people, these politicians unruly politicians wil l obviously fun them so that they can be seen as the heroes. Firstly, they monopolize the media and use it to propagate these courses. This eventually pokes holes into the community and creates differences that eventually results into chaos and riots in these groups. In the year 2006 for instance, two major national wide riots erupted in the country of France. The first was in economic in nature and started in the month of February and the next was both religious and ethnic erupted in November the same year. These riots are among the examples that can be brought about by the diverse opinions within the nation. Democracy can be said to be a pluralist system of power distribution that is set to distribute power among the many and diverse competing groups even though not equally. Even if democracy can be said to be somehow worse, it achieves a greater take of political compare amongst the citizens than any other form and hence reflects the primal belief that all individuals or human s are all born equal and so the consent of governance should originate from the governed (Dahl, 1998). In addition, this form of government allows individuals to protect their self interests. The nature of humans dictates that each and either individual desires some control over their needs and wants and John Stuart wedge said that the ability to protect ones interests protects us from evil in the manpower of others. The competition that exists between different groups of people within the society is merely what differentiates democracy from authoritarianism. As it was argued by (Flinders, 2010), Difference is good. The discussion and debate along with the process of the right to freedom of speech act as the pillars upon which democracy is formed. Inherently, democracy is a system of rights. By definition, democracy grants both civil and political rights to the citizens so that they can fully participate in the democratic process.The nature of humans dictates that each and ever y individual desires some control over their needs and wants and John Stuart Mill said that the ability to protect ones interests protects us from evil in the hands of others. The competition that exists between different groups of people within the society is exactly what differentiates democracy from authoritarianism. As it was argued by (Flinders, 2010), Difference is good. The discussion and debate along with the exercise of the right to freedom of speech act as the pillars upon which democracy is formed. Inherently, democracy is a system of rights. By definition, democracy grants both civil and political rights to the citizens so that they can fully participate in the democratic process. So as for all the citizens to participate and hear the voice of their people, it is then very vital to grant these citizens the right to the freedom of assembly that is not provided for in the totalitarian nor in the authoritative regimes. The belief of equality is also one of the building pill ars of democracy and thus enforcing and establishing the rights gives this a greater degree of equality than any other non-democratic form of government. In fact, granting these rights helps shield the minority from persecution and also allow them to also protect their interests. The society that we are in these geezerhood is made up of heterogeneous groups, all which represent different and change interests all these must be respected and recognized. If we do not catch this, we will obviously be committing ourselves to rule by an elite or selected few who think that their interest are over those of the other people.The jurisprudence vehemence and democracy in Canada In Canada, the use of law personnel office and violence has become one of the greatest concerns to the society. Many civilians and students are becoming to a greater extent concerned about the chock up that is applied by the police in most encounters with the citizens in different situation. Following some of t he seriously encounters the people had with the police officers, many people are now tending to think that police in most of the time act to disrobe the people their constitutional rights and hence they are violating the rule of democracy. The critics say that police sometimes employ much power to the civilians by use of violence and force. On the other hand, the advocates of this say that the police are entitled to use any power to stop crimes and also secure the peoples wellbeing. For years the violence and force that has been used by police officers and the local authority in Canada has been not only of major concern but also a significant issue that has to be addressed for democracy to be realised. It all commences when a police officer abuse the powers that has been delegated to them by the state and constitution. In Canada, it has become obvious that each day in and day out there must be a case where a police officer has employed excessive power to the civilians. As the lite racy levels are increasing all day, people are becoming more aware of their democratic rights and the voices are becoming united daily. The authorities and the officers are in place to protect, help and promote safety in communities. There many people who are filing complaints daily against the police officers who are causing violence and using un demand force during arrest. In many instances in the city, we have seen how two or three police officers eat up up a defenceless citizen using their batons or how they mistreat women and teenagers. These are all the cases that are act against democracy of whom the people should be enjoying, owing to the fact that this is a rule for the people, for the people and by the people. The heightened technology and the media has promoted the sense that the police are culminating violence by abusing their powers. This has created fear and mistrust by the people towards the police departments. In accordance to the penal law guidelines, the police a re only justified to use force that is only necessary to prevent homicide or a crime.The advocates The advocates for the police usage of power and force term the police as an armed force for participation and protection. They defy the power of the police by them being armed forces then, they demonstrate their power by stating protection and express their community connection by stating that they participate. First these officers have the delegated power by their weapon that they carry and the ability that this weapon has to make other people to comply to the law. They argue that, by the fact that police have been given the mandate to protect they must in any means pursue this goal even if it means use of excessive or unnecessary powers. Finally, the participation concept emphasizes the relationship between the officer and the community. To ensure that the communities are safeguarded effectively, they are free to use any power whether it means to deprive a person his/her constituti onal rights or not.How we can improve democracy on this issue The police officers also being one of the citizens, they should strive to serve the communities they are in with their topper interest at heart while safeguarding the democratic rights of the civilians. The police officers are the officials that are mandated to impose the laws while preserving order in the society and they should not act in a manner that may culminate violence or in any case deprive any individual his/her democratic rights. In the cases that the police officers are called into some stressful and unsafe events that may involve violent altercations, that must be controlled. We as the citizens also do not want to see our streets run by criminals who pressure other people. It is true that in some cases police officers are allowed to use force but not in all the situations or self created situations geared at harassing a civilian or depriving him/her his/her democratic rights. let us all observe the law.Refe rencesAbraham Lincoln. The Gettysburg Adddress. Availablehttp//www.historyplace.com/speech/gettysburg.htm. Last assessed 05 June 2012Dahl, Robert A. On Democracy. New Haven Yale UP, 1998. Print.Dobson, William J. The Dictators Learning Curve privileged the Global Battle for Democracy. New York Doubleday, 2012. Print.Flinders, Matthew V. classless Drift Majoritarian Modification and Democratic Anomie in the United Kingdom. Oxford Oxford UP, 2010. Print.Johnson, Marilynn S. Johnson, ed. Street Justice A History of Police Violence in Canada. Beacon Press. p.365. 2004.Loree, Don Corruption in Policing Causes and Consequences A Review of the Literature. Research and Evaluation Community, Contract and patriarchal Policing Services Directorate. Royal Canadian Mounted Police, 2006Peterson, Amsterdam.Democracy, Policy and Economic development. capital of Sweden Stockholm Press, 2005.Stein Ringen. Three Priorities to Improve UK Democracy,2007Theocracy. Available http//www.merriam-webster.c om/dictionary/theocracy.Last accessed 05 Jude 2012 computer address document