The Role of Multinational Corporations Essay Example for Free

The affair of Multinational Corporations EssayAbstractLiterature and hold forth relating to Multinational Corporations (MNCs) and human rights is ubiquitous with speculative public debate on the merits and demerits of the potential harmonious existence of the two. Some argue that by virtue of the consequential results of their stage business operations, MNCs have the potential to alleviate human suffering. For others, they are the cause of it.Advocates of both perspectives draw on a mixture of factual experiences and theoretical propositions to substantiate their positions. Empirical analysis is often used to differing degrees, and with differing levels of success, to pass on authenticate these dichotomised positions. Diverging standpoints, when empirically endorsed, however, ensure that no coherent theory fucking be extrapolated and utilize to specific location and circumstance. With competing views, respectively backed up by statistical entropy, no overarching determi nation can be made as to the potential effects of the economic operations of these entities.It is suggested therefore that the trajectory of discourse should be altered so as to assess this relationship from a business perspective first, and a human rights perspective second. That is, in altering positional focus to whether or not human rights is skillful for business, theoretical suggestions may be legitimately substantiated in the absence of unequivocal empirical data by assessing the extent to which MNCs are in fact liable(predicate) to respect human rights.IntroductionIn 1996 William Meyers work, which supported theories that MNCs have an overall beneficial impact on both first and second genesis rights in developing countries, appeared in Human Rights Quarterly. Using Data from Freedom House and the Commerce Department, and date acknowledging that MNCs have at times had a detrimental effect on human rights, Meyer argued that civil and political rights, and economic, social and cultural rights, correlate positively with Direct Foreign Investment (DFI).Incontradistinction to Meyers claims, however, and using data from Amnesty International, the State Department and the worldly concern Bank, Smith et al. responded that MNCs have in fact a negative impact on human rights.Both positions derive from a determination to substantiate theoretical claims relating to diverging positions on, not only existing relationships, but equally of the potential results of that mutual existence. Both key therefore, empirical evidence on previously enunciated theoretical claims relating to the relationship of business and human rights generally. The intention of this theme is to alter positional focus on theoretical positions relating to the pros and cons of business for human rights, and subsequent empirical investigations, to a position which questions.Yet as Meyer, responding to Smith et al. concedes, neither study can be used to support a claim that MNCs are always po sitive, or always negative, in relation to human rights. This is largely a result of the fact that the fundamental problem with Meyers approach or smith et al.s is that they cannot distinguish between MNCs that do, in fact, promote human rights and those which, in fact, do not.Therefore, when scholars such as Jack Donnelly assert that if business function is justified in part because it helps human rights, we can legitimately ask for concrete evidence of that help,what is likely to surface is not in fact unequivocal evidence relating to the realities of this co-existence, but rather the selective inclusion of data which supports ones particular position Empiricism is in fact an illusion.Engines of Development dissertation 1 . Meyer, W.H. 1996. Human Rights and MNCs Theory Versus Quantitative Analysis, Human Rights Quarterly 18(2), 368-397. 2 . Smith, J., Bolyard, M., and Ippolito, A. 1999. Human Rights and the world(a) Economy A Response to Meyer, 21 Human Rights Quarterly 207. 3 . Meyer, W.H. 1999. Confirming, Infirming, and Falsifying Theories of Human Rights Reflections on Smith, Bolyard, and Ippolito Through the Lens of Lakatos,Human Rights Quarterly 21(1), 220-228. 4 .Winston, M.E. Multinational Corporations and Human Rights, Address at the Mobil Corporation World Affairs Meeting (6 June 1996) cited in Meyer note 25. 5 . Donnelly, J. International Human Rights (2nd ed. 1998).