Thursday, April 4, 2019

Side Effects of Nanoparticles on Health

Side Effects of Nanoparticles on HealthPrakriti Gurung AbstractWhat are the side effect of exploitation Nanotechnology on healthcare? Nanotechnology has revolutionised medicine with its innovative applications yet oft is yet to be researched on its adverse make. While nanoparticles are used for drug deli actually and medical equipment, they define health risks as they are shown to be toxic, causing haemolysis, fervidness as well as cancerDS1. This is due to properties specific to nanoparticles such(prenominal) as high surface area to stool ratio and its shape. The high surface area makes nanoparticles very reactive and could initiate unwanted reactions inside the body if they react with biomolecules while the shape determines how the nanoparticles interact with its surroundings. solubility is another key factor which could potentiate harm as nanoparticles low solubility can melodic breeze lumps inside the body as they accumilate in one specific region and damage vit al organs. Therefore, Nanotechnology should be equally revered and feared for it uses in medicine.IntroductionNanotechnology is a branch of technology which involves manipulating structures and properties at the nanoscale range, from 1 to deoxycytidine monophosphate nanometres. A particle which is 1 nanometre in size is 1 - 10-9 metres small a ordinal of a metre. With the concept introduced initially in 1959 by physicist Richard P Feynman during his Theres Plenty of Room at the understructure talk where he expressed the cogency to control and manipulate individual atoms and molecules, the study has today demonstrable exponentially to revolutionise perspectives in cosmetics industry, agriculture and near recently, medicine.Medicine has thrived through the incorporation of nanotechnology in its sector of force as the efficacy of drugs improved significantly due to its implementation in drug delivery, isolation of cancer cells in the body and reparations in clogged arteries. H owever, use of nanotechnology can be risky as particles guide unalikely at a nanoscale level. This unpredictability can pose hazards to human health if it is unable to be controlled in its application in medicine Substances such as engineered fibrous nano-hooeys can set ardour on lungs while the small size of individual particles allows them to enter cells and form clumps. This report will research the risks and hazards nanotechnology carries in its application in medicine on human health.ToxicityOne of the major characteristics of nanoparticles is its perniciousness and so far most of the research done around this area comes from inhaled nanoparticles in the air. What makes the nanoparticles toxic in particular is its individual chemical properties with Carbon Black nanoparticles causing more severe health effects compared to its other counterparts. However it is subjective to contamination caused by human activity such as taint as well as to consider that nanoparticles in th e ambient air engender complex motif with organic and metal components such as metallic iron interacting which may cause the adverse health effects. Metallic iron was shown to potentiate the effect of Carbon Black nanoparticles through increased reactivity (Wilson et al 2002).The toxicity of the nanoparticles are similarly dependent on its size as particles so small at the nanoscale level farts to an increase in surface area to mass ratio. This means more chemical molecules are present on the surface of the nanoparticles which resurrects toxicity. During the study of low toxicity particles, TiO2 particles with higher surface area was shown to start out more severe lung ignition and particle lymph node burden compared to BaSO4 particles with lower surface area (Tran et al 2000). Furthermore, their large surface area makes them highly reactive, which could lead to activate unknown chemical reactions or to alignment with toxins, allowing for nanoparticles to enter cells other th an the ones targeted.Shapes overly play a key role in the characteristics such as the respirability and inflammatory potential of individual nanoparticles. A prime example of these are nanotubes. In addition to cosmos carcinogenic, single wall carbon nanotubes where shown to induce Lung Granulomas, a type of turmoil, and thus demonstrated to be very toxic. However this could also be due to the high mass dose. To add, studies using human keratinocyte cell line also showed that carbon nanotube exposure resulted in cell toxicity and accelerated oxidative punctuate (Shvedova et al 2003) , which is an imbalance between the free radical production in the human body and the ability to neutralise its harmful effects.SolubilityDifferent types of nanoparticles waste varying solubility, and it is those nanoparticles with low solubility that could pose the most health risks. The risks are greater if the nanoparticles comprise of inorganic metal oxides and metal as they could react with bi o-molecular structures indoors the body. Another factor to consider is if it is able to be broken down and be degraded It would lead to the nanoparticles to accumulate within the body and damage organs. Furthermore due to its high reactivity and electrical charge, nanoparticles attain conditions within the body where they come together to form larger particles, described as particle aggregation. This could potentiate the risks even move on as this alters their physiochemical properties leading to unknown reactions inside cells.NanofibresNanofibres are fibers that have diameters of less than railway yard nm, and its medical applications range from wound dressings to artificial organ transplants. nanofibres are created by an electrospinning process that ranges from 10nm to several blow nanometres. The unique process through which it is do gives the nanofibres special properties due to its high surface area to mass ratio such as low density, high pore volume, and tight pore size. Researchers have also demonstrated new ways to make nanofibres out of proteins naturally occurring in furrow, which makes it ideal for use in bandages as they eventually dissolve in the body (Hegde, Dahiya, and Kamath, 2005). This also makes it possible to add antibacterial material and drugs to the nanofibre structure, minimising infection rate, blood loss and more effective as it is absorbed by the body. Another cogitation within medicine where nanofibres are used is tissue engineering, making them possible substrates for growing cells. Nanofibre substrates effectively throw cell multiplication and enable tissue replacement prepared from a patients cells. The material it is made from also makes it is possible to incorporate different bioactive materials and drugs. Barrier textiles, when containing hydrophobic nanofibre layers work as effective barriers for microorganism sixth sense such as viruses and bacteria (Nanofiber applications, 2004). However, nanofibres can also pose significant health risks to humans. When silver nanofibres of different lengths were injected into lungs of mice, those larger than 5000 nm in size became lodged in lungs and caused inflammation while the smaller ones cleared past (BBC, 2012). Although it is questionable whether the same results are applicable on humans as the test was done on mice. Ken Donaldson, professor of respiratory toxicology at the University of Edinburgh, said Concern has been expressed that new kinds of nanofibres being made by nanotechnology industries might pose a risk because they have a similar shape to asbestos. Asbestos fibres were shown to cause mesothelioma, a type of lung cancer.Drug DeliveryNanofibre membranes from bipolymers are used as drug carriers or bioactive compounds. The usefulness of this is that the membranes are engineered to specifically target diseased cells, therefore reducing the damage done to healthy cells. The benefits of using nanoparticles in drug delivery is that it is poss ible to attach ethylene glycol molecules which enables the nanoparticles to circulate in the blood stream. This is due to the ethylene glycol molecules which stops the white blood cells from attacking the nanoparticles. While the benefits of nanoparticles in drug delivery are immense, there are serious adverse effects which need to be researched further Cationic nanoparticles, which are ligand coated nanoparticles used as agents for drug delivery, such as gold and polystyrene have been shown to cause haemolysis (rupture of red blood cells) and blood clotting (De Jong and Borm, 2008). Positive correlation is also observed between nanoparticle exposure and the amount of cardiovascular diseases however there is no definitive explanation. Toxicological studies have demonstrated that certain nanoparticles can gain access to the blood following inhalation and can enhance experimental thrombosis (blood clotting in circulatory system) but it is not clear whether this was an effect of pulmo nary inflammation or particles translocated to the blood. Another type of nanoparticle, DEP (Diesel exhaust particulate), were shown to cause altered heart rate in hypertensive rats whereas high concentrations of anionic nanoparticles and cationic nanoparticles were toxic for the BBB (blood and brain barrier) (De Jong and Borm, 2008).ConclusionDS2Nanoparticles hold great significance in the field of medicine due to its frequent emergence they are everywhere from wound dressings to drug delivery. However much of the disadvantages in its application is yet to be researched as whatever little information is available lone(prenominal) comes from inhaled nanoparticles. If not researched thoroughly, the risk of nanoparticles could increase significantly, as it has already been demonstrated in lab rats which resulted in lung inflammation and blood clotting. Furthermore, the high surface area of nanopartcles makes them particularly sensitive when it comes to reactivity, which inside the hu man body could trigger unwanted reactions in turn causing damage to cells and organs. Therefore the subject of nanoparticles should be treated with caution, especially when it comes to application on humans in order to allow for safer usage in medicine. BibliographyDS3BBC (2012) Nanofibres may pose health risk. Available at http//www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-19355196 (Accessed 30 August 2016)Catherine Paddock PhD. 2012. Nanotechnology In Medicine Huge Potential, scarcely What Are The Risks?. ONLINE Available at http//www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/244972.php. Accessed 27 August 2016.De Jong, W.H. and Borm, P.J. (2008) Drug delivery and nanoparticles Applications and hazards,Drug delivery and nanoparticles Applications and hazards, 3(2) (Accessed 4 kinsfolk 2016).Hegde, R.R., Dahiya, A. and Kamath, M.G. (2005) NANOFIBERS. Available at http//www.engr.utk.edu/mse/Textiles/Nanofiber%20Nonwovens.htm (Accessed 30 August 2016).Nanofiber applications (2004) Available at http//www.elmarco. com/application-areas/medicine/ (Accessed 30 August 2016)Shvedova, A., Castranova, V., Kisin, E., Schwegler-Berry, D., Murray, A., Gandelsman, V., Maynard, A. and Baron, P., 2003. motion picture to carbon nanotube material assessment of nanotube cytotoxicity using human keratinocyte cells. Journal of toxicology and environmental health Part A,66(20), pp.1909-1926.Tran, C.L., Buchanan, D., Cullen, R.T., Searl, A., Jones, A.D. and Donaldson, K., 2000. Inhalation of poorly soluble particles. II. Influence of particle surface area on inflammation and clearance. Inhalation toxicology,12(12), pp.1113-1126.Wilson, M.R., Lightbody, J.H., Donaldson, K., Sales, J. and Stone, V., 2002. Interactions between ultrafine particles and transition metals in vivo and in vitro. Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 184(3), pp.172-179.DS1Good point, but should be supported by a reference.DS2GoodDS3Very good.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.