Containment Early Cold war Essay -- miscellaneous

Containment Early Cold warIn the early years of the Cold War, both the Truman and Eisenhower administrations chased a policy of containment to counter perceived Soviet aggression. Generally, the presidential administrations pursued this policy to maintain stability in the international arena, to maintain a correspondence of power, and also in a sense, to express disapproval of totalitarian, non-democratic regimes. Containment was expressed through a variety of policies and institutions sparing, political and, of course, military. The ways the early presidential administrations defined and implement containment strategy inevitably changed in focus, importance, and emphasis over time. While both external and internal reasons accounted to an extent for the specifics of the containment policies of both administrations, the Truman administration was more concerned with maintaining a balance of power within the international community than necessarily appeasing internal pressures, espec ially fiscal pressures. The Eisenhower administration, on the other hand, assigned a greater importance to domestic politics in formulating its containment policies. First I will outline the differences of the two administrations, and then I will argue that the differences in the two administrations stem from their predominant influences whereas external threats mainly shaped the Truman administrations containment policy, internal politics mainly shaped the Eisenhower administrations containment policy. First of all, both administrations had several(predicate) economic priorities. Although Truman was concerned around keeping taxes low and government spending capped, he also saw the need for military expenditures in Europe and Asia to keep an adequate balance of power. Truman implement an assortment of aid packages to Europe and Asia, in effect, to help those countries help themselves. He saw economic stability as essential for peace and stability in the intentional arena. Moreov er, he saw giving aid to these countries as a way to subtly influence the ideology of their constituents. Furthermore, Truman accepted ongoing government economic intervention as an appropriate way to direct resources within the economy. Eisenhower, on the other hand, was more interested in a conservative fiscal policy, and clenched control on government spending. He was more intent on trading with the countrie... ...endencies, they took their influence for policy from different sources. Thus, their foreign policy had a different approach. The Truman administration was more concerned with Stalins expansionist tendencies, and sought to contain him by the best means possible, which he considered to be conventional warfare. Truman used ornateness and threat to sell his policy to Congress and the American people, because his policy was expensive. Eisenhower, on the other hand, was more concerned with his popularity and cutting taxes than pursuing expensive overseas militaries. He was able to cut costs by using nuclear capabilities as a deterrent against the Soviets. Thus, he used a more capital-intensive, and less effortful means to detract Soviet expansion. Because he was able to cut costs so effectively, it was not as important for him to sell him policy to the public. That is namely why Eisenhower was such a popular president.Referenceswww.globalsecurity.org/military/ library/report/1992/MJA.htmwww.nwc.navy.mil/CNCSCaseStudies/cases/case09.htmwww.cnn.com/SPECIALS/cold.war/kbank/profiles/truman/regentsprep.org/Regents/ushisgov/themes/ presidentialactions/commander.cfm